(no subject)
Jul. 21st, 2007 12:05 pmI'm replacing my desktop's 80GB internal HD because I need more capacity.
Do I spend $80 on a 320GB, or $110 on a 500GB? Both are 7200RPM with 16MB cache and similar latency. The 500GB has slightly better seek spec, but this is negligible.
The question, really, is this: will I have 320GB worth of files before I replace my computer? (There's no chance of using this HD in the hypothetical new system, as I'm currently IDE and will go to SATA or SCSI.)
Hmm. Yeah, I prolly will. I've been talking about upgrading for the last 2 years now and haven't wanted to spend the money. Sigh.
Anyone?
Do I spend $80 on a 320GB, or $110 on a 500GB? Both are 7200RPM with 16MB cache and similar latency. The 500GB has slightly better seek spec, but this is negligible.
The question, really, is this: will I have 320GB worth of files before I replace my computer? (There's no chance of using this HD in the hypothetical new system, as I'm currently IDE and will go to SATA or
Hmm. Yeah, I prolly will. I've been talking about upgrading for the last 2 years now and haven't wanted to spend the money. Sigh.
Anyone?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-21 05:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-21 05:45 pm (UTC)I'm sure you're perfectly mindful about data backups, but [insert-friendly-reminder-here]. That'll be something you want to factor into the equation, too. If you have offline storage, you can get by with something a little smaller, and just kill files once they've moved over to offline and backup.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-21 06:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-22 03:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-07-22 05:07 am (UTC)